So Much for that Issue

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,146
Tokens
Ex-Guardsman Says Bush Served in Ala.

Feb 13, 12:38 PM (ET)

By ALLEN G. BREED

A retired Alabama Air National Guard officer said Friday that he remembers George W. Bush showing up for duty in Alabama in 1972, reading safety magazines and flight manuals in an office as he performed his weekend obligations.

"I saw him each drill period," retired Lt. Col. John "Bill" Calhoun said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press from Daytona Beach, Fla., where he is preparing to watch this weekend's big NASCAR race.

"He was very aggressive about doing his duty there. He never complained about it. ... He was very dedicated to what he was doing in the Guard. He showed up on time and he left at the end of the day."

Calhoun, whose name was supplied to the AP by a Republican close to Bush, is the first member of the 187th Tactical Reconnaissance Group to recall Bush distinctly at the Alabama base in the period of 1972-1973. He was the unit's flight safety officer.

The 69-year-old president of an Atlanta insulation company said Bush showed up for work at Dannelly Air National Guard Base for drills on at least six occasions. Bush and Calhoun had both been trained as fighter pilots, and Calhoun said the two would swap "war stories" and even eat lunch together on base.

Calhoun is named in 187th unit rosters obtained by the AP as serving under the deputy commander of operations plans. Bush was in Alabama on non-flying status.

"He sat in my office most of the time - he would read," Calhoun said. "He had your training manuals from your aircraft he was flying. He'd study those some. He'd read safety magazines, which is a common thing for pilots."

Democrats have asked for proof that Bush, then a 1st lieutenant with the Texas Air National Guard, turned up for duty in Alabama, where Bush had asked to be assigned while he worked on the U.S. Senate campaign of family friend Winton "Red" Blount.

Pay and medical records released by the White House this week failed to quash allegations that Bush shirked his Guard responsibilities.

The 187th's former commander, retired Brig. Gen. William Turnipseed, has said he doesn't remember Bush ever turning up on base, and more than a dozen members of the 800-person unit, including its commander, told The Associated Press this week they have no recollection of Bush. Critics have made much of the fact that the White House has failed to produce anyone who could remember seeing Bush there.

Calhoun said he contacted Texas GOP leaders with his story in 2000 when the issue was raised just before the November general election.

"I got on the phone and got information and called Austin, Texas, and talked to the Republican campaign. They said I was talking to the campaign manager," he said. "I told him my story and said I would be glad to provide information to that effect. At that time they said ... The story is not true. And we don't think it's got enough weight to stay out as a story.' And they said, 'But if it does we'll call you back.' And I never heard from them again."

Last week as the issue raged again, Calhoun sent an e-mail to the White House offering to tell his story. "I got a response back, one of those automatic responses," he said. It wasn't until his wife contacted Georgia GOP officials that Calhoun's name surfaced.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan said Friday that the White House was not making any effort to try to locate people who might have served with Bush. He also accused reporters of trying to raise new lines of questioning, beyond whether Bush served in Alabama.

Critics have suggested that Bush used his family connections to get the safe Guard assignment ahead of thousands of others. But Calhoun said Bush never mentioned his congressman father while they sat together at Dannelly.

Calhoun has not made any donations to Bush this election season or during the 2000 season, according to campaign finance records.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
I call bullshit. Typical news hacks.com story.

How come W. couldn't produce a single name he served with?

I could name you at least 50 people I served with 15 years ago and he cannot name one?

Which logically means W.

a. wasn't there
OR
b. is one of the dumbest mutherfvckers in recent memory
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,146
Tokens

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
Floyd,

Think about it. When they asked Bush he coudn't recall what he did or who he served with?

Hey, if I ever am a defendant at a jury trial I hope I get 12 guys just as gullible as you. No wonder OJ walks free today.
icon_rolleyes.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,146
Tokens
So the Lt. Col. was hallucinating when he saw Bush on duty in Alabama??

Or is he a liar because what he says goes against your conclusion?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,530
Tokens
You guys kill me....No matter what proof comes out you are just going to say you don't believe it. You are in deep denial!

Here's a question.....Why was Kerry bitching a few years ago about everyone questioning Clinton's service yet it's OK for everyone to question Bush's service?

Anyone?

KMAN
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by KMAN:

Here's a question.....Why was Kerry bitching a few years ago about everyone questioning Clinton's service yet it's OK for everyone to question Bush's service?

Anyone?

KMAN<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Maybe that link I posted has something to do with it.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
Floyd,

Imagine you're in a courtroom and defendant claims he was at a certain place at a certain time. He can't tell you what he was doing or who was there.

No documents can prove he was there.

They ask a dozen people (from your own article) that were there at same time and they don't remember him being there.

One guy does. And that's your overwhelming evidence. "One guy saw him sit so you must acquit".
icon_rolleyes.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
608
Tokens
kmaN,

The answer is actually two fold. 1st, even though Clinton was a little slimey, everyone liked him and he did his job to the best of his abilities. 2nd, Bush is a Deushbag.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,530
Tokens
xpanda - I can't get to your site from work.

MassMil - Simply says Bush is a deushbag...

That's a great response....typical lib.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
818
Tokens
KMAN,

It's true Dems and people like me are bringing it up. Kerry himself hasn't, to my knowledge.

regards Clinton, Clinton didn't proclaim himself "war president", Bush did.
 

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
Messages
75,154
Tokens
Truth And Consequences


Richard Blow is the former executive editor of George Magazine. He is author of American Son: A Portrait of John F. Kennedy, Jr., and is writing a book about Harvard University.


On Tuesday, Feb. 10, the White House did, by the standards of this information-hostile administration, a remarkable thing: In an attempt to show that President Bush had completed his required National Guard duty, the administration released the president's military pay records. But for a White House that has been masterful at manipulating the press, this was a badly botched job.

The records didn't prove what the White House suggested they did, and only fuel the perception that the president has something to hide.

The controversy surrounding Bush's military service is a rare bird—a campaign issue that surfaces in one election, fails to catch on, and then resurfaces with greater impact four years later. It began in 2000 when The Boston Globe ran a series of articles investigating Bush's time in the National Guard. The Globe strongly suggested that Bush had skipped a year's worth of service, from May 1972 through April 1973, while in Alabama. (He'd asked to be transferred there from Texas to work for a Republican senate campaign.) But Al Gore wouldn't pursue the issue, and it died.

It returned this year because of a political odd couple, Michael Moore and Wesley Clark. Moore, a Clark backer, repeatedly introduced the general at rallies by saying he'd like see a debate between Clark and Bush—"the general and the deserter."

But even that dramatic line would have faded into obscurity if Peter Jennings hadn't introduced it into broader discourse at a New Hampshire Democratic debate in late January. Jennings asked Clark about Moore's accusation, saying, "Now, that's a reckless charge, not supported by the facts, and I was curious to know why you didn't contradict him."

Jennings was wrong. It was a hyperbolic charge, because "deserter" has a specific legal definition in the military. But it wasn't reckless. And with the political environment different than it was in 2000—when the president has led the country into a dubious war, his own record suddenly seems fairer game—Democrats realized that maybe the accusation was smart politics. Democratic National Committee chair Terry McAuliffe publicly and pointedly declared that Bush had been "AWOL." The press began to pick up on the issue, with Salon, The New Republic and Slate publishing smart pieces arguing that the issue was worth revisiting.

Finally Tim Russert asked Bush about the controversy on his "Meet the Press" interview last Sunday, and Bush gave a thoroughly unconvincing non-denial denial. Next came the unsuccessful record release.

In Iraq, Bush has scored points by framing the debate as a matter of proving a negative: Prove that Saddam Hussein didn't have WMDs. But on this issue, Bush has to prove an affirmative—that he did show up for National Guard duty from May 1972 through April 1973. If John Kerry or his surrogates want to keep this issue alive, they should put the burden of proof on the president with lines like, "I call on President Bush to prove that he did not shirk his National Guard duty." If Bush could, he would have done so by now.

In his "Meet the Press" interview, Bush tried to fend off the attacks on his record by suggesting that they were really attacks on the National Guard. May I suggest a response? "The president says criticisms of his year-long absence from duty are a criticism of the National Guard. But the president skipped a year of service. And after that he dropped out eight months early to go to Harvard. So who's really insulting the National Guard?"

There may be only one thing the White House can do to nip this problem in the bud, and that's change the subject—dramatically. On Thursday morning, Feb. 12, the Drudge Report bannered a high-profile accusation that news organizations were investigating a rumor that John Kerry had had an affair with, apparently, a campaign intern. (Drudge's wording was ambiguous.)

A friend who used to work in Democratic politics e-mailed me that "this has Chris Lehane's fingerprints all over it," referring to the Democratic hatchet man who worked for Kerry, then Wes Clark. Since Clark just ended his campaign, I'm not so sure. I wonder if the White House didn't just change the subject.
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
Right Floyd, the idea of a "cover up" would just be unthinkable, right?

Phewwwwwwww - for a second, I thought this might have been the very first lie to protect a politician. Glad you cleared that up
icon_rolleyes.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Kerry said he didn't bring it up and wants it to stop. Word is this is all Terry McAuliffe's work and the DNC and Kerry aren't exactly on good terms. I think the DNC isn't going to get too involved with a Kerry White House, they are more focused on getting back some seats. It is a tough task in Congress to gain seats as a Dem so hence the early start on the rough campaigning. The whole thing is a non-issue to me. I believe if it was Dean there you better believe the Republicans would have been hammering at his lack of military service. Who really cares much about Bush and what he did in the National Guard except for people into dirty politics?
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
The mainstream media is so fxckin laughable at this point it is pathetic..I never ever seen so much be put into a non story as this...the funny part about it the average person sees what hatchet job this is.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,730
Tokens
The White House has just dumped a load of docs onto those reporters, including pay records showing Bush was paid for 25 days of service between May 1972 and May 1973.

Another democrat lie debunked.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,180
Messages
13,565,063
Members
100,759
Latest member
68gamebaiartt
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com